Message boards :
Number crunching :
Started converting back to classic
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
Author | Message |
---|---|
Robert Sullivan, MD Send message Joined: 31 Oct 00 Posts: 221 Credit: 358,173 RAC: 0 |
"Give me work units or give me death." Patrick Henry, I think. |
FloridaBear Send message Joined: 28 Mar 02 Posts: 117 Credit: 6,480,773 RAC: 0 |
Everette Dobbins wrote: I have 25 computers running this might be interesting. 2years ago I had 4 computers running my average (kWh) used was 1,726 for 1 month. 1year ago I added 4 more computers my average (kWh) used was 1,987 for 1 month. This year I have 25 computers running my average through Dec/2004 was for 1 month 3,187 (kWh) a month that comes out to $496.00-$520.00 a month to run seti for me. Hmm. That seems a bit high. Taking your 4 computer setup and your 25 computer setup, we have a difference of 1,461 kWh for the additional 21 computers, or about 70 kWh per computer per month. So, 25 computers gives 25*70=1750 kWh for your farm (a large one, I might add!). The other 1400 kWh or so is for the rest of your house. Here in Florida, I pay $.09 per kWh; unless electricity is extraordinarily expensive where you are, it should work out to more like $158 per month for your 25 computers. Since you've used your overall electricity cost, that includes additional A/C costs and maybe even reduced heating costs. 70 kWh seems to be about right for each computer--that's about 100 watts, running 24/7. (0.1 kW * 24 hours/day * 30 days/month = 72kWh/month) By the way, that's pretty amazing to be consuming more power for SETI than the entire rest of your house! |
kzhorse Send message Joined: 30 Jun 03 Posts: 113 Credit: 2,476,352 RAC: 0 |
I would rather have 2000 or 2003 server but out of my price range. When I'm getting NT 4.0 server/5 cal and front page what ever that is for $24 shipped so I guess I will have fun setting it up. Scott " " |
Bob Chr. Laryea Send message Joined: 1 May 02 Posts: 122 Credit: 83,877 RAC: 0 |
> > Damn I thought this was out of BETA testing. > > Maybe I should shut them all down till they get it right > > > > We are not in Beta Testing here! > Wait Until after Monday to make your decision > Rom and The team are adding new equipment and have let the > Units run down to accomidate the new server... > > > TimmY > > KZHorse. Easy Chief! Slow down and relax... > Since when did we get out of Beta? I haven't heard anything and anyone say that we are not Beta testing, as of today ofcourse . Are we then GAMMA testing :-D Regards Regards |
Borgholio Send message Joined: 2 Aug 99 Posts: 654 Credit: 18,623,738 RAC: 45 |
> I would rather have 2000 or 2003 server but out of my price range. > When I'm getting NT 4.0 server/5 cal > and front page what ever that is for $24 shipped so I guess I will have fun > setting it up. > > Scott > Unless you're actually using NT 4.0 in a business machine, don't worry about the licenses. MS doesn't even support NT anymore, so why bother with licenses? You will be assimilated...bunghole! |
kzhorse Send message Joined: 30 Jun 03 Posts: 113 Credit: 2,476,352 RAC: 0 |
> > I would rather have 2000 or 2003 server but out of my price range. > > When I'm getting NT 4.0 server/5 cal > > and front page what ever that is for $24 shipped so I guess I will have > fun > > setting it up. > > > > Scott > > > > Unless you're actually using NT 4.0 in a business machine, don't worry about > the licenses. MS doesn't even support NT anymore, so why bother with > licenses? > MS might have a problem with then as the guy I'm getting them from had 3 auctions with different packages I think a 10 CAL of workstation and somthing elese and got shut down. I got the one that I'm getting from "but it now" they were to late,already finished transaction He sais they were never regustered so It should all be good. Scott " " |
Everette Dobbins Send message Joined: 13 Jan 00 Posts: 291 Credit: 22,594,655 RAC: 0 |
> Everette Dobbins wrote: > I have 25 computers running this might be interesting. 2years ago I had 4 > computers running my average (kWh) used was 1,726 for 1 month. 1year ago I > added 4 more computers my average (kWh) used was 1,987 for 1 month. This > year > I have 25 computers running my average through Dec/2004 was for 1 month > 3,187 > (kWh) a month that comes out to $496.00-$520.00 a month to run seti for me. > > > > Hmm. That seems a bit high. Taking your 4 computer setup and your 25 computer > setup, we have a difference of 1,461 kWh for the additional 21 computers, or > about 70 kWh per computer per month. So, 25 computers gives 25*70=1750 kWh for > your farm (a large one, I might add!). The other 1400 kWh or so is for the > rest of your house. Here in Florida, I pay $.09 per kWh; unless electricity is > extraordinarily expensive where you are, it should work out to more like $158 > per month for your 25 computers. Since you've used your overall electricity > cost, that includes additional A/C costs and maybe even reduced heating > costs. > > 70 kWh seems to be about right for each computer--that's about 100 watts, > running 24/7. (0.1 kW * 24 hours/day * 30 days/month = 72kWh/month) > > By the way, that's pretty amazing to be consuming more power for SETI than the > entire rest of your house! > > This includes my total electric bill in my house with the added computers. There is a reduced heating cost no ac yet and today I added another computer so this will be interesting for me to see how it affects my electric bill. But if I should ever have a dispute I will refer them to you since you have all this electrical billing experience. |
Borgholio Send message Joined: 2 Aug 99 Posts: 654 Credit: 18,623,738 RAC: 45 |
> > > I would rather have 2000 or 2003 server but out of my price range. > > > When I'm getting NT 4.0 server/5 cal > > > and front page what ever that is for $24 shipped so I guess I will > have > > fun > > > setting it up. > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > Unless you're actually using NT 4.0 in a business machine, don't worry > about > > the licenses. MS doesn't even support NT anymore, so why bother with > > licenses? > > > > MS might have a problem with then as the guy I'm getting them from had 3 > auctions with different packages I think a 10 CAL of workstation and somthing > elese and got shut down. > I got the one that I'm getting from "but it now" they were to late,already > finished transaction He sais they were never regustered so It should all be > good. > > Scott > I would assume they shut it down for a different reason, as I can't imagine Microsoft would spend money punishing people for using products that produce no income whatsoever anymore. You will be assimilated...bunghole! |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 19 Jul 00 Posts: 3898 Credit: 1,158,042 RAC: 0 |
> I would assume they shut it down for a different reason, as I can't imagine > Microsoft would spend money punishing people for using products that produce > no income whatsoever anymore. You obviously don't know Microsoft ... Not only would they expect him to pay, but also to pay to upgrade ... |
FloridaBear Send message Joined: 28 Mar 02 Posts: 117 Credit: 6,480,773 RAC: 0 |
> This includes my total electric bill in my house with the added computers. > There is a reduced heating cost no ac yet and today I added another computer > so this will be interesting for me to see how it affects my electric bill. But > if I should ever have a dispute I will refer them to you since you have all > this electrical billing experience. > I never claimed to have electrical billing experience--I was simply doing some basic math. If you're paying $500 per month for SETI, that would work out to 500/1750=$0.29 per kWH, which is over 3 times what I pay. I'm not saying that you're NOT paying that, my exact words were "that seems a bit high." With your new computer, your electric bill should go up by about .1*24*30=72 kWh, times whatever you pay per kWh. Look, I didn't mean to start an argument here, I just thought the math would be interesting. I think your commitment to SETI is admirable. |
SwissNic Send message Joined: 27 Nov 99 Posts: 78 Credit: 633,713 RAC: 0 |
Hi Guys, Just reading through this thread, and I must say, found it VERY amusing!!! I run about 10 pc's dedicated to SETI (it varies) and have my turnaround set to 1.5 days usually. When the DB slowed, I switched that to 3.5 days. During the upgrade period, I lost a load of positions in rank, and was getting almost no credit per day, BUT I never once ran out of work... All machines constantly had 2/3 WU's in cache, and they were receiving them at a rate of a couple per day as needed... Now the guys@berkeley did a great upgrade job, I am now watching my credit increase very quickly... I'm guessing I have circa 5-6k credit heading my way... Over 1k already today... What I don't get is why so many people are throwing their toys out the pram and complaining??? Don't you guys have patience? What's the big deal??? Taker a chill pill and enjoy the science!!! ;o))) Nuff said... |
mikey Send message Joined: 17 Dec 99 Posts: 4215 Credit: 3,474,603 RAC: 0 |
edited |
Hans Dorn Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2262 Credit: 26,448,570 RAC: 0 |
> Hi Guys, > > Just reading through this thread, and I must say, found it VERY amusing!!! > > I run about 10 pc's dedicated to SETI (it varies) and have my turnaround set > to 1.5 days usually. When the DB slowed, I switched that to 3.5 days. > I did the same thing, but too late. When I upped my cache size, WUs were getting scarce already, so I lost some time. Regards Hans |
Everette Dobbins Send message Joined: 13 Jan 00 Posts: 291 Credit: 22,594,655 RAC: 0 |
> > This includes my total electric bill in my house with the added > computers. > > There is a reduced heating cost no ac yet and today I added another > computer > > so this will be interesting for me to see how it affects my electric > bill. But > > if I should ever have a dispute I will refer them to you since you have > all > > this electrical billing experience. > > > > I never claimed to have electrical billing experience--I was simply doing some > basic math. If you're paying $500 per month for SETI, that would work out to > 500/1750=$0.29 per kWH, which is over 3 times what I pay. I'm not saying that > you're NOT paying that, my exact words were "that seems a bit high." With your > new computer, your electric bill should go up by about .1*24*30=72 kWh, times > whatever you pay per kWh. > > So you are saying that everyone is on florida electricty rates and this is what rates are based on the florida electric company. Ok lard ass you took a poke at me. You dont want to argue hmm. Gasoline average price in florida is $1.85 a gallon. So according to you all gasoline sold in the usa is $1.85 based on the florida price. If gas or electricity is paid at any other rate you are a liar and I dont want to start an argument. Ok lard ass then dont. > Look, I didn't mean to start an argument here, I just thought the math would > be interesting. I think your commitment to SETI is admirable. > |
SwissNic Send message Joined: 27 Nov 99 Posts: 78 Credit: 633,713 RAC: 0 |
> I did the same thing, but too late. When I upped my cache size, WUs were > getting scarce already, so I lost some time. > > Regards Hans > Sorry to hear that Hans! But by the look of the new DB server, I don't think we will have to worry about that again!!! ;o)))) Re. This fuel cost argument... I live in Europe where we pay a helll of a lot more for gas/electricity than you do - so stop whinging will ya!!! ;o)))) Mit freudlich gruessen / A Bientot / Ciao / Cheers, Nicholas. |
Everette Dobbins Send message Joined: 13 Jan 00 Posts: 291 Credit: 22,594,655 RAC: 0 |
> > > I did the same thing, but too late. When I upped my cache size, WUs were > > getting scarce already, so I lost some time. > > > > Regards Hans > > > > Sorry to hear that Hans! But by the look of the new DB server, I don't think > we will have to worry about that again!!! ;o)))) > > Re. This fuel cost argument... I live in Europe where we pay a helll of a lot > more for gas/electricity than you do - so stop whinging will ya!!! ;o)))) > > Mit freudlich gruessen / A Bientot / Ciao / Cheers, > > Nicholas. > > > > OK |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.