Message boards :
Number crunching :
Matt, Where are the 150,000 results (waiting for validation)?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Author | Message |
---|---|
Borgholio Send message Joined: 2 Aug 99 Posts: 654 Credit: 18,623,738 RAC: 45 |
> Ready to send 525,430 > In progress 911,200 > Waiting for validation 190,635 > > I think we're all fully capable of checking the server stats page ourselves. Thanks. You will be assimilated...bunghole! |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
Ready to send 590,373 In progress 1,612,324 Waiting for validation 175,965 |
Purdy Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 76 Credit: 42 RAC: 0 |
> Okay.. you're right. I should have said: "the numbers on the status page that > *I* deal with are accurate." I know the results "ready to send" number is > correct. I've never really been in the development loop regarding > validation/credit but my current understanding is: > 1. When that "waiting for validation" number is 0, everybody who deserves > credit should have gotten their credit. > 2. That number is currently messed up and we're not sure why. Not my > department. Other people are trying to sort this out. > Of course, as of right now these numbers are all "0" but that's because we > just had a massive server outage and all the stats collectors are getting back > up to speed. > - Matt Thank you very much Matt We can see you are now feeding back to the Validator the missing 300,000 results! From the Cobblebeat Graph we can see that the Validator is still working full speed without problems and the new server still rocks! Some people might be surprised to see the validator's queue going up at this stage. Maybe it should be explained that results were taken out of the Validator's queue before (when there were problems with the old server) and now these results are being returned into the queue. Good job Matt is very reassuring to know that our hard work is in good hands and you are not just loosing results. Kind regards Purdy & Poppy |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.