Ready to send 46?

Message boards : Number crunching : Ready to send 46?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
B-Roy

Send message
Joined: 4 May 03
Posts: 220
Credit: 260,955
RAC: 1
Austria
Message 76058 - Posted: 2 Feb 2005, 22:30:22 UTC

Ready to send 46
In progress 2,643,466
Waiting for validation 159
ID: 76058 · Report as offensive
Divide Overflow
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 365
Credit: 131,684
RAC: 0
United States
Message 76064 - Posted: 2 Feb 2005, 22:45:47 UTC

The ready to send number would explain why things ran dry for a while there, but the waiting for validation number is completely out of whack.

ID: 76064 · Report as offensive
Profile [B^S] wulfin
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 03
Posts: 2
Credit: 417,432
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 76076 - Posted: 2 Feb 2005, 23:12:30 UTC

i would definitely agree with the waiting for validation number..considering about 48 of those would be mine.. LOL
ID: 76076 · Report as offensive
Profile RichaG
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 May 99
Posts: 1690
Credit: 19,287,294
RAC: 36
United States
Message 76102 - Posted: 3 Feb 2005, 0:13:52 UTC

The waiting on validation counts only the wus that have a quorum of successful results and is marked for validation.

Most of the pending wus are not marked for validation because someone hasn't return a result.

People upping their queues has used up the ready to send queue.

Red Bull Air Racing

Gas price by zip at Seti

ID: 76102 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 76285 - Posted: 4 Feb 2005, 1:55:01 UTC - in response to Message 76102.  

> The waiting on validation counts only the wus that have a quorum of successful
> results and is marked for validation.
>
> Most of the pending wus are not marked for validation because someone hasn't
> return a result.
>
> People upping their queues has used up the ready to send queue.
>
AHEM...that is not true this time. The database is acting screwy and they are trying to figure out why. If there are only 49 waiting for validation, then what in the heck happened to the other few hundred I am waiting for that do have at least 3 good results returned. I have 13 machines crunching and usually return a ton every day, I and many others, are not getting those verified because the database is slowing down, "for unknown reasons", which is in turn skewing the numbers ALOT! I personally have well over a hundred maybe even 2 or 3 hundred results that are waiting and DO have at least 3 apparently valid results. The validater WILL get to them, just when it is good and ready!!

ID: 76285 · Report as offensive
EclipseHA

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 99
Posts: 1018
Credit: 530,719
RAC: 0
United States
Message 76290 - Posted: 4 Feb 2005, 2:02:14 UTC

I wonder if they tried to use a Snap Appliance box again.......

:)
ID: 76290 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 76420 - Posted: 4 Feb 2005, 12:27:30 UTC - in response to Message 76285.  

> AHEM...that is not true this time. The database is acting screwy and they are
> trying to figure out why. If there are only 49 waiting for validation, then
> what in the heck happened to the other few hundred I am waiting for that do
> have at least 3 good results returned. I have 13 machines crunching and
> usually return a ton every day, ...

Beats me, :)

But I am kinda glad I changed my allocations to 57.14% CPDN, 28.57 to Predictor@Home and 14.29% to SETI@Home
ID: 76420 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Ready to send 46?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.